“Hey Matt. I had a lingering question about using rel=canonical vs. 301 redirects. It takes longer for Google to find the rel=canonical pages but 301 redirects seem to lose impact (link juice) over time. Is there similar churn with rel=canonical?”

from Sam Crocker, London, UK

Have a question? Ask it in our Webmaster Help Forum: www.google.com Want your question to be answered on a video like this?

Follow us on Twitter and look for an announcement when we take new questions: twitter.com

More videos: www.youtube.com

Webmaster Central Blog: googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com

Webmaster Central: www.google.com

About the author

 Is there an advantage to using rel=canonical over a 301 redirect? Hi, I'm Teena Hughes and I'm a techno-geek who loves the internet, technology and the fast pace of exciting new innovations. I love to share my knowledge and experience with others by helping them create their websites, build an online presence, become an expert in their field by using techniques like SEO, video marketing, online & offline marketing and many other groovy tools :-) If you'd like some help or to be pointed in the right direction, contact me today - I'd love to chat and to offer help in an easy-to-understand way, with easy-to-follow instructions and guidance.
Teena Hughes & BuildAWebsiteTonight on Google +
BuildAWebsiteTonight on Facebook
BuildAWebsiteTonight Youtube Channel

pdf Is there an advantage to using rel=canonical over a 301 redirect?Download Article Post to PDF
share save 171 16 Is there an advantage to using rel=canonical over a 301 redirect?